Most Powerful

• #1 Patriarch Kirill
  Eastern EuropeGlobal Orthodox communitiesMoscowRussiaSt. PetersburgUkraine PoliticalReligionReligious Hierarchy 21st Century Religious HierarchyState Power Power: 100
  Patriarch Kirill (secular name Vladimir Mikhailovich Gundyaev; born 1946) is the Patriarch of Moscow and All Rus’ and the primate of the Russian Orthodox Church, a position he has held since 2009. He emerged as one of the most influential religious leaders in modern Russia by expanding the Church’s institutional presence, strengthening ties with the state, and advancing a public theology that links national identity, social conservatism, and geopolitical sovereignty.
• #2 Viktor Yanukovych
  Ukraine Imperial SovereigntyPolitical 21st Century State Power Power: 100
  Viktor Yanukovych (born 1950) is a Ukrainian politician who served as prime minister and later as president of Ukraine from 2010 until his removal in February 2014. He is closely associated with the political and business networks of eastern Ukraine and with a governing style that relied on patronage, control of security institutions, and strategic alignment with powerful oligarchic interests.
• #3 Vladimir Putin
  EurasiaEuropeMiddle EastMoscowRussiaSt. PetersburgUkraine Party State ControlPolitical 21st Century State Power Power: 100
  Vladimir Putin (born 1952) is a Russian politician and former intelligence officer who has shaped Russia’s state structure and external posture more than any leader since the collapse of the Soviet Union. He rose from the security services into national office in 1999 and has served as president from 2000 to 2008 and from 2012 to the present, with a term as prime minister in between. His governing model is defined by the consolidation of executive authority, the elevation of security institutions as core instruments of rule, and a strategic use of energy, state corporations, and law enforcement to discipline rivals and manage elite competition.
• #4 Yevgeny Prigozhin
  AfricaInternationalRussiaSyriaUkraine FinancialMilitaryMilitary Command 21st Century Finance and WealthMilitary Command Power: 100
  Yevgeny Viktorovich Prigozhin (1961–2023) was a Russian businessman and paramilitary leader best known for his role in building and directing the Wagner Group, a private military organization that operated in multiple conflict zones while maintaining deep connections to Russian state interests. He also controlled a contracting and catering business empire that obtained substantial government-linked procurement, which contributed to his nickname in international media as “Putin’s chef.”
• #5 Victor Pinchuk
  EuropeGlobalUkraine IndustrialIndustrial Capital ControlMedia 21st Century Industrial CapitalMonopoly Control Power: 87
  Victor Pinchuk (1960–020) was an industrialist associated with Ukraine and Europe. Victor Pinchuk is best known for building Interpipe and related industrial holdings and developing major Ukrainian media and philanthropic institutions. This profile belongs to the site’s study of industrial capital control, where influence depends on controlling systems rather than possessing money alone. In the twenty-first century, power frequently travels through digital platforms, data, logistics, attention, cloud infrastructure, and the ability to set terms for other participants in the market.
• #6 Rinat Akhmetov
  DonbasInternationalUkraine PoliticalResource Extraction ControlResources 21st Century State Power Power: 77
  Rinat Akhmetov (born 1966) is a Ukrainian industrialist whose wealth and influence were built through command over the heavy-industrial core of the Donbas, especially coal, steel, electricity, and associated infrastructure. He is one of the clearest examples of post-Soviet oligarchic power rooted in resource-linked industry rather than in purely financial engineering. His significance lies in having transformed control over extraction and processing assets into a broader system of regional, national, and political influence.He belongs in resource extraction control because the base of his fortune has long been tied to coal mines, metallurgical assets, power generation, and the logistical systems that connect them. These are not abstract holdings. They are strategic assets in a country where industry, energy security, and political power have often been inseparable. Akhmetov’s empire came to embody the linkage between industrial geography and elite authority in independent Ukraine.His importance increased because his core territories became some of the most contested spaces in Europe. The wars that followed 2014 and especially the full-scale Russian invasion in 2022 did not merely threaten his fortune. They exposed how vulnerable even enormous industrial empires are when they depend on fixed assets in frontline regions. Akhmetov therefore became not only a symbol of oligarchic rise but also of oligarchic fragility under geopolitical catastrophe.His profile matters because it reveals both the strength and the limits of extractive-industrial power. For years he seemed to exemplify the durability of asset-heavy regional capitalism. Yet his later experience showed that mines, furnaces, and power plants can become targets, stranded assets, or legal claims when war redraws the practical map of value.
• #7 Jan Koum
  InternationalUkraineUnited States TechnologicalTechnology Platform Control 21st Century Technology Platforms Power: 72
  Jan Koum is the immigrant entrepreneur best known as the co-founder of WhatsApp, the messaging platform that became one of the most consequential communication networks in the world. His importance lies in helping build a service so simple, reliable, and globally portable that it rewired everyday communication across continents. He belongs in technology platform control because WhatsApp became infrastructure: families, businesses, migrant communities, political movements, and informal economies all came to depend on it as a default channel of connection.Koum’s significance is easy to underestimate if one looks only at the app’s minimal interface. WhatsApp did not become powerful by theatrical design. It became powerful by eliminating friction. It worked across borders, reduced the cost of keeping in touch, and aligned closely with the phone’s contact list rather than a more performative public profile. That made it especially powerful in countries and communities where messaging was not a supplement to daily life, but a core social necessity.He also matters because his story sits at the crossroads of privacy, platform integration, and big-tech acquisition. WhatsApp’s growth carried ideals about simplicity and restraint, yet its sale to Facebook placed it inside one of the largest and most contested platform empires of the age. Koum’s later departure came to symbolize the tension between an encryption- and privacy-oriented messaging ethos and a larger corporate drive toward monetization and ecosystem integration.
• #8 Len Blavatnik
  UkraineUnited KingdomUnited States FinancialFinancial Network ControlIndustrial 21st Century Finance and Wealth Power: 72
  Sir Leonard Valentinovich Blavatnik (born June 14, 1957), known as Len Blavatnik, is a Ukrainian-born British-American businessman and philanthropist. He founded Access Industries, a privately held investment group headquartered in New York, and built a fortune through holdings in energy, chemicals, and global media. Blavatnik is widely associated with ownership of Warner Music Group and with significant philanthropic giving to universities and cultural institutions, including major support for the University of Oxford’s Blavatnik School of Government. In the Financial Network Control topology, his influence is rooted in private holding-company discretion: the ability to move capital across sectors, acquire trophy assets, and convert industrial returns into cultural and educational power. His portfolio sits close to other media-and-finance controllers such as [John Malone](https://moneytyrants.com/john-malone/) and cultural patrons such as [Julia Koch](https://moneytyrants.com/julia-koch/).
• #9 Semion Mogilevich
  Eastern EuropeRussiaUkraineUnited States CriminalCriminal EnterpriseFinancial Cold War and Globalization Finance and WealthIllicit Networks Power: 62
  Semion Mogilevich (born 1946) is a Ukrainian-born figure whom U.S. and European authorities have long described as one of the most significant organizers of transnational post-Soviet crime. Unlike classic gang leaders identified mainly with one city or one visible syndicate, Mogilevich became associated with a networked model of criminal power built around finance, corporate fronts, multiple aliases, and cross-border mobility. He has been accused or indicted in connection with fraud, money laundering, racketeering, and other offenses, including the YBM Magnex securities case in the United States. His historical importance lies in the way his name became shorthand for a shift in organized crime from territorially bounded underworlds to globally mobile systems in which laundering, shell structures, and regulatory arbitrage could matter as much as narcotics routes or street crews.
• #10 Leonid Fedun
  RussiaUkraine IndustrialResource Extraction Control 21st Century Finance and Wealth Power: 47
  Leonid Fedun (born 1956) is a Russian businessman best known as a co-founder and long-time senior figure of Lukoil, one of the major oil companies to emerge from the post-Soviet reordering of the energy sector. His career is important because it captures a specific route to wealth in modern Eurasia: the transformation of former Soviet managerial and technical networks into private ownership over vast resource systems. In that world, fortunes did not arise merely from entrepreneurial invention. They arose from control of infrastructure, legal transitions, and privileged access to the commanding heights of the oil economy.Fedun belongs in resource extraction control because oil sat at the heart of both his wealth and his influence. Lukoil was never just a producer. It was a vertically integrated company spanning extraction, refining, trading, and fuel distribution, with a reach that extended into foreign assets and international capital markets. To hold a large stake in such a company was to hold more than personal wealth. It was to occupy a strategic position within the machine that converted hydrocarbons into state revenue, corporate power, and geopolitical leverage.Unlike some oligarchs whose public image depended on flamboyance, Fedun often appeared more technocratic and less theatrical. Yet that should not obscure his significance. He was part of the class that turned the dislocation of the 1990s into durable command over Russian resource capitalism. His long partnership with Vagit Alekperov made him one of the principal architects of Lukoil’s rise, while his financial structures and investments extended the reach of that influence beyond the core business itself.His story also reveals the fragility of such fortunes in a sanctions era. What looked for decades like a stable stake in a globalizing oil champion became far more precarious after Russia’s confrontation with the West hardened and capital became politically trapped. Fedun’s biography therefore runs from expansion and asset accumulation to withdrawal and unwinding. That arc makes him a useful figure for understanding both the making and partial unmaking of post-Soviet oil wealth.